Feedline selection is one of those topics that can start a 300-reply thread on QRZ forums. Coax fans will tell you ladder line is an impractical relic. Open wire enthusiasts will tell you coax is lossy garbage that wastes your precious watts. Both camps are simultaneously right and wrong depending on the situation.
The honest answer: it depends on your antenna, your installation constraints, and what bands you operate. Let's get into the specifics so you can make the right call for your station.
Quick Primer: What's the Difference?
Coaxial cable has a center conductor surrounded by dielectric insulation, then a braided or foil shield, then an outer jacket. The RF travels between the center conductor and shield, contained within the cable. It's unbalanced transmission line.
Ladder line (also called window line, open-wire feedline, or twin-lead) has two parallel conductors held at a fixed spacing by insulating spacers. The RF field exists in the space between and around both conductors. It's balanced transmission line.
Both move RF from your antenna to your radio. But they do it differently, with dramatically different loss characteristics under certain conditions.
The Loss Story: Where Ladder Line Destroys Coax
Here's the thing most hams hear but don't fully internalize: the loss difference only matters significantly when SWR is high.
At 1:1 SWR (antenna perfectly matched), both feedlines are efficient. RG-8X coax at 14 MHz loses about 1.2 dB per 100 feet. 450-ohm ladder line loses about 0.1 dB per 100 feet. That's a real difference (roughly 1 dB, which is about 20% of your power), but not earth-shattering for most stations with short runs.
Now jack the SWR up to 10:1 (which happens when you use a single dipole far from resonance on another band). That same RG-8X now loses 4-5 dB per 100 feet. You're losing 60-70% of your transmit power as heat in the coax. Ladder line at the same SWR? Still under 0.5 dB per 100 feet. Almost nothing.
This is why ladder line with a tuner is the classic approach for multiband wire antennas. You accept the high SWR on the feedline (which ladder line handles gracefully) and use a balanced tuner at the radio end to transform the impedance.
But wait. Before you rip out all your coax, read the rest.
When Coax Wins
Coax has massive practical advantages that keep it dominant in most amateur installations:
Routing flexibility. You can run coax through walls, along metal gutters, through conduit, tape it to your mast, bury it underground, coil up the excess. Coax doesn't care. The shield keeps the RF contained regardless of what's nearby.
No spacing requirements. Ladder line needs to stay away from metal and maintain consistent spacing. You can't run it through a conduit, zip-tie it to your tower, or let it rest against aluminum siding. Coax goes wherever you need it.
Connectors. PL-259 on one end, SO-239 on your rig. Done. Standardized, widely available, cheap. Ladder line connections involve knife switches, balanced tuners, or ugly balun transitions that add complexity.
Commercial equipment expects it. Your radio has a coax connector, not binding posts. Your amplifier, your SWR meter, your antenna switch. The entire station infrastructure assumes coax. Using ladder line means adding a balun or balanced tuner to interface with everything else.
Weather tolerance. Coax works when wet, when iced, when covered in snow. Ladder line's characteristics shift when wet (the dielectric between conductors changes). 450-ohm window line handles moisture better than flat 300-ohm twin-lead, but neither matches coax in foul weather.
I ran 450-ohm ladder line to a 135-foot doublet for about two years. Gorgeous performance on every band from 80 through 10. But the installation drove me slightly crazy. I had to bring it away from the house using standoff insulators, couldn't route it through my wall (had to come in through a window with a pass-through plate), and every ice storm changed the line's behavior until it dried out. Swapped to a fan dipole on coax and lost some multiband flexibility, but gained sanity.
When Ladder Line Wins
Despite the practical hassles, ladder line is genuinely superior in specific scenarios:
Multiband doublets. A 135-foot center-fed doublet with ladder line to a balanced tuner is one of the most versatile HF antenna systems possible. Works 80 through 10 meters, reasonable efficiency on all bands, one antenna does everything. The key is that SWR on the feedline will be all over the place (often 10:1 or higher on some bands), and ladder line handles this without significant loss.
Long feedline runs at HF. If your antenna is 150+ feet from your shack, coax losses accumulate fast. On 80 meters, 200 feet of RG-8X loses 2+ dB even at low SWR. Ladder line at the same distance loses almost nothing.
Low-band operations. On 160m and 80m, where antennas are often physically short (high SWR), the ladder line advantage is most pronounced. Running 80m through 100 feet of coax to a short vertical with 6:1 SWR is painful. Same feedline in ladder line? Minimal added loss.
Stations where maximum efficiency matters. If you're running QRP (5 watts), every dB counts. You can't afford to lose 3 dB in feedline losses. That's half your power gone before it reaches the antenna.
Practical Installation Notes
Coax Best Practices
- Use quality connectors. Cheap PL-259s develop intermittent connections and water ingress. Amphenol or equivalent.
- Weatherproof outdoor connections. Self-amalgamating tape (like 3M 2228) over the connector, then electrical tape over that.
- Support coax at regular intervals so weight doesn't stress connectors. Plastic cable staples every 3-4 feet on vertical runs.
- Minimum bend radius: usually 5-10x the cable diameter. Don't kink it.
- For long runs on VHF/UHF, step up to LMR-400 or equivalent low-loss cable. At HF, the difference between RG-8X and LMR-400 is smaller.
Ladder Line Best Practices
- Keep it 6+ inches away from metal (gutters, siding, masts, other cables). Use standoff insulators.
- Don't run it parallel to metal surfaces for long distances.
- Keep it reasonably taut to maintain spacing. Slack ladder line that swings in the wind will have inconsistent impedance.
- Where it enters the building, use a bulkhead pass-through. You can buy or build these. Maintain the conductor spacing through the wall.
- A balun (4:1 or 1:1 current balun) at the shack end transitions to coax for the final short run to your radio, OR use a balanced antenna tuner directly (like a Johnson Matchbox or MFJ-974H).
Loss Comparison Table
Here's a rough comparison for 100 feet of feedline at 14 MHz:
Feedline Type Loss at 1:1 SWR Loss at 5:1 SWR Loss at 10:1 SWR RG-58 2.0 dB 4.5 dB 7+ dB RG-8X 1.2 dB 3.0 dB 5+ dB RG-213 / LMR-400 0.7 dB 1.8 dB 3.5 dB 450-ohm ladder line 0.1 dB 0.3 dB 0.5 dB 600-ohm open wire 0.05 dB 0.15 dB 0.3 dBLook at the 10:1 SWR column. RG-58 loses 7+ dB. That means about 80% of your power turns into heat inside the cable. Ladder line at the same SWR barely notices. The physics are dramatic.
But again (and I can't stress this enough): if your antenna is resonant and matched, the difference between good coax and ladder line is around 1 dB for typical amateur run lengths. Most people can't hear 1 dB.
The Hybrid Approach
Many experienced hams use both. The common setup:
- Ladder line from the antenna to near the house (where it runs in open air away from structures)
- A 4:1 current balun at the house entry point
- Short run of coax (10-20 feet) from balun to the shack
- A tuner at the radio to handle residual mismatch
This gives you most of the ladder line efficiency advantage while dealing with the routing problem at the house end. The short coax run between balun and radio has minimal loss even at moderate SWR.
Another hybrid: use coax for your resonant single-band antennas (Yagi, single-band dipole) where SWR is already low, and ladder line for your multiband doublet or loop that sees high SWR on some bands.
My Controversial Take
For the majority of hams operating on one or two HF bands with a resonant antenna and 50-75 feet of feedline, coax is the right choice. Period. The loss penalty is minimal when SWR is low, the installation is ten times easier, and the entire station ecosystem is built around it.
Ladder line starts making sense when you want true multiband coverage from a single wire antenna without a tuner matching every band into coax that's bleeding power as heat. If that's your situation, absolutely, use ladder line. But don't let forum purists make you feel bad about running RG-8X to your resonant dipole. The real-world difference is often less than 1 S-unit.
Final Thought
Pick the feedline that matches your antenna system and installation reality. Resonant antenna with short run? Coax. Multiband wire antenna with high SWR on some bands? Ladder line earns its complexity. Both work. Neither is universally better. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling something or fighting a forum war from 2004.
Community field notes
No community notes yet. Be the first to share how this performs in your shack.
Log in to share your field notes and photos.